Peter W Jones  AMInstP

Change of Initials

With effect from 1.1.09 I shall be “MInstP”

My blogs are for reference and are accessed at numerous points, each with a title. It will be some time before all the headings are changed.

 

The most recent entries to my blogs are at

www.caravanaccidents3.wordpress.com

See also

www.aerodynamicsoftrailers.wordpress.com

www.caravanaccidents.wordpress.com

www.caravanaccidents2.wordpress.com

 

NB

ANEMOMETERS

I have no control over, and do not profit from advertisements on this blog.

A hand held anemometer will normally only give you a reading for the air speed. As these are quite inexpensive this would be of some assistance and would be safe if used only when your vehicle is at rest.

It would be dangerous and counterproductive to use them whilst driving.

See

www.caravanaccidents3.wordpress.com

Scroll down past the index to:- 

Paragraph 1

"Air Speed Indicators."

Peter W Jones  AMInstP

 

To day I noticed that there had been the most significant advance since I started investigating snaking caravan accidents in 2003.

 

A considerable number of people must be reading the Bath University research as the Google Search Engine  has moved the item below into a much more prominent position.

***************************************************** 

University of Bath

School of Mechanical Engineering

THE DYNAMICS OF TOWED

VEHICLES

An experimental study into caravan snaking

Final year project

submitted by Christopher J Killer

for the degree of MEng

of the University of Bath

23 May 2003

Assessor RFN

Supervisor JD

Technician PC

*******************************************************************

11 Conclusion

 

********************************************************************************************

The performance of the Alko 2004 tow ball friction damper has been shown to be very effective at smoothing down snaking oscillations and reducing settling time. But this does not necessarily mean that it makes the coupled combination any safer, i.e. increase the snaking speed. Theory states that this type of damping has little effect on the snaking speed, and tests have shown no evidence to suggest otherwise.

 

********************************************************************************************

 

11.1 Practical advice for caravan owners & designers

Nothing fundamentally new was discovered in this study, but theoretical factors suggested in the past have been substantiated by road-tested evidence. The theoretical advice that is now known to be significant in increasing stability includes the following points.

For owners:

Make sure car is suitable for the size of caravan

Load heaviest items in the car if possible

Locate other heavy items in the centre of the caravan, just forward of its axle

Make sure tow ball load is adequately high

Avoid sharp steer inputs at high speed

Never exceed 60mph

PWJ

I hope that the above extract will encourage more reading of the Bath Research, but please note that when making your tow ball load as great as possible you should not exceed the tow car manufacture's maximum allowed load.

 18b

HGV TRAILERS

Peter W Jones AMInstP

 

 I have noticed that monitoring for wind speed at critical points on our major roads is only done with pre ww2 wind socks. Every sailing cruiser only slightly larger than my Jaguar 21 (with 2 crew weight = 1000kg ) seems to be equipped with an anemometer giving a digital read out of wind speed and direction in front of the person steering.

We need these devices on our major roads linked to traffic control centres so that Police can give out on the indicator boards actual wind speeds so that drivers can act on their own initiative as appropriate for their own vehicles and trailers, instead of just being told (for instance) that there is a speed restriction of 40 mph due to strong winds which is meant to restrict all vehicles irrespective of weight and other characteristics.

My rough estimate of critical head wind air speed for one type of HGV trailer is given further below. 

My small 4m body length caravan weighing 1000kg is susceptible to snaking when its air speed exceeds 50 mph and the side wind component exceeds 30 mph. I need to know therefore if the side wind  at a particularly exposed section of road exceeds 30 mph. I have already explained in other parts of my blogs how I arrived at these values, partly using my experience gained on open waters with sailing cruisers.

When looking at weather forecasts it is better to seek out the speed of the strongest gusts forecast before deciding whether it is safe to be on the road.  

Notices on the back of a number of HGV's urge the public to phone and comment on the driving standards. However we do not know the standards prescribed. The DfT should consider updating their advice on safety when it is windy particularly on matters that relate to the safety of  HGV's especially high aspect trailers, caravans and below 3.5 tonne trailers.

I have previously pointed out that vehicle manufacturers ( as with air craft manufacturers) should be required to establish critical wind speeds with some degree of accuracy for each type of vehicle sold.

I have observed that road users are increasingly prepared to pay for extra safety devices such as electronic brakes and air bags, and feel certain that when they understand why knowledge of air speeds and side wind components is important for safety reasons, they will be prepared to pay extra for vehicles that are sold with the relevant information in the owner’s handbook.

As I have never driven an HGV or sailed a boat larger than my daughter’s 29ft Westerly (about 4000kg), my estimates for HGV critical air speeds and side wind components are not be very accurate. I am therefore pointing out how to make estimates so that those with relevant towing experience can do this for themselves.

I can be quite accurate concerning the fact that in the USA (for instance) when a Hurricane force wind is expected those able to do so move out of the immediate coastal area until the danger has passed. The remainder of the population go into buildings constructed so that they can withstand Hurricane force winds.

According to the Beaufort Wind Scale for Mariners a Hurricane is Force 12 ( about 78 mph) and above. If you are driving at an indicated 55 mph it will only take a head wind of 23 mph to bring the air speed that the vehicle/trailer is subjected to up to the bottom end of the dreaded Hurricane strength. The aerodynamics of trailers in particular needs to be taken very seriously.

In 1999 Bath University published “Towed Vehicle Aerodynamics” by Standen; the wind tunnel tests had proved that aerofoils to create down force as speed increases improved the stability of a caravan with a (approximately) central axle.

Aerodynamically a HGV trailer with approximately central axles/axle is  similar to a caravan.

Only a minority of HGV’s tow trailers with central axles, but there will also be the evidence of tyre marks on the road from all snaking accidents which may be similar to those which have been “leaked” to me concerning snaking caravan accidents.

The above Bath university results clearly stated that some trailer snaking is caused by the wind and explained how this happens.

As I feel that I have established that the maximum safe air speed for my small caravan is about 50 mph, and this is the stalling speed for a typical light aircraft of the same weight, I feel that I am justified in saying that the maximum safe air speed for a central axle HGV trailer is VERY ROUGHLY the same as the stalling speed of an aircraft of the same weight. In the absence at the moment of accurate figures from people with access to instrumentation that can measure the amount of lift created by the air under the vehicles, I suggest that HGV drivers cultivate the acquaintance of an airline pilot and try and obtain some confidential advice concerning stalling speeds to compare with their own experiences of the air speeds and side wind speeds when snaking/jack knifing has taken place. Starting about 30 years ago I always managed to avoid wind induced snaking by obtaining information from Radio 4 shipping forecasts and estimating the likely speeds inland. More recently I have been able to get a very good wind speed forecast from the BBC weather forecast on the web, but we really need to go direct to the met office so that we obtain the maximum speed of wind gusts.

As I started towing on the road when I purchased my first sailing cruiser I was always very aware of the power of the wind and those who doubt this should talk to people who sail some of the types of boat I list below. These sailors will be only too pleased to help as the relevant information concerning sailing cruisers is not confidential. I want the sailing community to tell people the area of sail they use to sail their boats in gale force winds (about 44mph) in sheltered waters where the sea is calm. If HGV drivers then compare the relevant sail area with the area of the side of their trailer of the same weight as a sailing cruiser, they will then understand why something needs to be done to improve road safety by using electronic braking systems and aerofoils to create down force on all trailers as well as paying greater attention to weather forecasts and "critical" speeds.

Aerofoils for HGV trailers would have to be quite large, and as this matter was not allowed for when bridges were built engineers will have a difficult problem to solve when designing the aerofoils for large trailers. For those who can afford the million euro VW sports car this problem has been solved by a computer controlled aerofoil over the rear wheels ( but I would not suggest that the latter is a good tow car!) Formula 1 racing cars, after years of development, now have two fixed aerofoils, one between the front wheels and one over the rear wheels. Rally cars are beginning to use fixed aerofoils and when the latter are above the level of the car roof they must be very effective.

Addendum Nov 2008

As I took a particular interest in Louis Hamiltons' performance in F1 racing this year I could not fail to notice that they have now added extra aerofoils.

A few Statistics:-

SAILING CRUISERS

Nicholson 55 (Weight 17.3 metric tonnes; area of main sail = 48.3 square metres ); Nicholson 42 (wt 10.16 tonnes)

Bowman 57 ( wt 19.05 tonnes); Ocean 71 (29.06 tonnes);

Source:- Boating World Guide to Sailing Cruisers; 1976

AIR LINERS

Boeing 737; weight 45.36 tonnes; take off air speed 150 mph.

Source of information:-
www.aerospaceweb.org.uk

My estimate of stalling air speed = 120 mph.

 

Fairchild Aviation C123B

Weight, 27 tonnes.  Stalling air speed, 96mph

Based on the above I would therefore estimate that a 27 tonne HGV trailer (if such a trailer is legal and exists) with approximately central axles would become liable to snaking when the air speed reached 96mph. The driver would be aware of the air speed if he/she had an appropriate indicator.

At 55mph road speed one only needs a head wind component of 41 mph (gale force is about 44 mph) to reach the estimated critical speed.

 

Tiger Moth Biplane.

As one of my main recreational activties over the last 32 years has been estuary and coastal sailing, I have never had the usual experience of flying off to wamer climates for my holidays.

I have only taken to the air twice, and that was as a passenger in a Tiger Moth Biplane in 1951. During the Summer holidays HMG "called me up" again to do an additional two weeks National Service in the RAF. During my 18 months national service I was an "Audiometrician," so it was deemed appropriate that I did some flying.

In 2003 when I started enquiring about the reasons for caravans snaking I recalled that the Tiger Moth take off speed was about 60 mph and that it must have weighed about the same as my small caravan.

You will see from my blogs that my memory had not failed as similar sized modern light aircraft have comparable statistics.

 

 

 

 

 

Wind induced Rail Accidents

 

Information from the inter net

Japanese Research.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

December 2002. Pages 1601 to 1610.

 

Several rail accidents have been caused by strong winds.

Solutions.

Wind barriers (fences) at critical points.

Speed restrictions; Suspension of services;

Regulation of operations based on wind speed and direction.

 

Japanese Railway Accident

The Japan Times 03-04-08

Wind Induced Derailment; 46 passengers; 5 killed, 33 injured.

Police are still investigating whether speed restrictions and the number of wind speed monitoring points were adequate.

The railway company may be prosecuted.

 

The late Mrs Dunwoody MP

Ex Chair of the Select Committee of the HoC on Transport.

In the UK  this matter was hardly recognised as a problem untill the HoC select Committee on Transport published my short paper in 2006. (view this by putting "Caravan and HGV Trailer Accidents" in to the UK Parliament on line web site search engine ). Bath University research had been ignored by the caravan industry/caravan clubs and was possibly not known about by the remainder of the corporate sector ( except that indespension.co.uk recognise the fact that strong winds can cause trailer snaking and some wind protection has been created on UK roads eg the M4 new crossing of the Severn Estuary).

 Due I am sure mainly to the efforts of Mrs Dunwoody, the Highways Agency are now warning caravanners of the dangers of cross winds and have increased the number of warnings issued advising all motorists to slow down due to strong winds (ie warnings on road side electronic displays).

In addition, following a recent accident, some rail companies are imposing speed limits when strong winds are forecast, but as far as I know, neither Network Rail or the Highways Agency have installed anemometers giving out wind speed and direction at the side of the track/road.

(see www.caravanaccidents3.wordpress.com 

Para 5  Letter to Mrs Dunwoody)  

 

 

 

 

Peter W Jones  AMInstP

 

 

 

SUMMARIES

I have now produced new summaries of the most important items I wish draw to the attention of trailer towers.

These are now at paragraphs

10ci to 10ciii

Caravan Accidents . (but also including all high aspect small trailers, with some references to hgv trailers.)

.

Peter W Jones AMInstP

Consultant for Towed Vehicle Accidents.

(charitable status to be applied for)

 

.

Index and list of Contents

www.caravanaccidents2.wordpress.com

contains paragraphs 1a to 10c

www.20six.co.uk/roadtrafficaccidents

contains paragraphs 10ci to 18b

NB. These paragraphs are not all in numerical order due to problems I have had transferring my work to blogs.

 

INDEX

(A)
accident statistics 1a : Accident-failure of over run brakes, 3c: Accident-failure of stabiliser, 3c: Acknowledgements, 5d, 5e, 5f, 6b : Air speed indicators, 6c:

Aircraft Stalling Speeds, 7g, 7h, 8a, 8b, 8c: Alko new brakes; history of

www.caravanaccidents3.wordpress.com

(B) Blog: aims of, 1d: Bath university on stabilisers, 2e:

Bath University on effect of bow wave of HGV, 9b:

Boat trailer snaking, 4a: Burst tyres (related to centre of mass and stability), 6a, 11e: Boeing 737, 8g:

{C} Caravan Club, 6a, 6g, 9b, 10, 6h, 6j: Centre of mass calculation, 18a:

Centrifugal force calculation, 12c: Conclusions, 16a:

 

(E) Evidence from sailing supports safer towing, 4c,5a,5b,5c:

Electric Brakes, 15b:

Equations of motion and stabilisers, 13a:

(F) Flying caravans, 6h: Formula 1 racing cars, 9e:

(G) Government Caravan Accident Statistics, 1a:  

 (H)

HGV trailers - summary, 18b; 

Handbook for air pilots, 6e, 7a: Head wind and side wind components, 7c, 7d: HGV’s and wind speed needed to over turn them, 7e, 7f: HGV‘s and maximum safe air speed, 9a: HGV‘s effect on caravans, 9c, 9d, 10a, 11a:

 (I)

 

Information on stalling speeds for aircraft, 7g, 8a, 8b:  Insurance, 17c:

(J) Jones, Peter W: career summary 1c, 1d:

(K) Kinetic Energy and caravans, 11f:

(L) Length of HGV bow wave related to length of caravan, 11d:

(M)Maximum legal caravan speed, 3b: Maximum safe caravan air speed, 6f, 6g, 6j: Mini bus accident, 1f, 1i:Marine safety measures applied to road, 14b:

(N) Newton; GCSE and GCE “A” level work 1b

(O)

(O)

Over run brakes - the case against  10cii 

 Over run brakes, 1e, 1g, 12a:  Over run brakes, alternatives, 2a: over run brakes and shock absorbers, 1h: Overloading of caravans, 17b: overloading of tow car, 17d:

 

(P)

 

 Physics of over turned minibus, 1g: Prevention of snaking, 4b, 2d, 2e: Phase of HGV bow waves, 11d:

Principle of Moments and stabilisers, 13a: Parallelogram of Velocities and vehicle air speed, 14b:

{R} Research at Bath University, 9b,d,e,& f: 10a & b: References, 10c. Resonance and caravans 11d: 

(S)

Snaking tyre marks - evidence produced by,  10ci 

Snaking tyre marks, 17a:Snaking, 2b, 11g, 12b: Snaking caravan accident,3a: Snaking prevention and stabilisers, 2d, 13a: Stabilisers and Bath University, 2e:

Stabiliser test on the friction based type (details of procedure), 10ciii;

Stabilisers (design faults with most of them), 2g: South African Mini Bus Accident, 1f, 1i:

 Stabiliser test (calculation of centre of mass), 18a: Selby road/rail disaster, 2c, 15a, 10cii: Somersaulting caravan, 3a, 6b: Standen (Bath University) on wind induced snaking, 10b: School Mini Bus, 10d:

Snaking calculations approximated to circular motion, 12b: 

Safety; actions taken to promote;

www.caravanaccidents3.wordpress.com

(T) Tyre marks made on the road in a snaking accident, 5g: TV adverts for cars concerning aerodynamic lift, 7h: Trailers-effect of the load on aerodynamics, 8d:

(U) University mini bus, 10d:

(V) Ventrui effect, 11b, 11c:

(W) Wind gusts, 6d: Wind deflectors, 8c, 9d: Wind speed monitoring on road and rail, 9g, 7f: Windy weather, 14a:

(Z) Zero road friction, 6f.